The irony is that most of us doing biomedical science don't consider what the exercise and sports scientists publish to be science. While I agree there's plenty of superstition in broscience, there's also many who empirically test their hypotheses and adjust as they get new data-- they're doing science.
Laughing at "kinesiologists" aside, there's also a general problem in biosciences of re-discovering major ideas every 10-20 years or so. Someone new gets in the field, makes a "seminal" discovery ...that was published 10-20 years ago in a smaller journal. Downside to information overload and the need to filter.
The irony is that most of us doing biomedical science don't consider what the exercise and sports scientists publish to be science. While I agree there's plenty of superstition in broscience, there's also many who empirically test their hypotheses and adjust as they get new data-- they're doing science.
Laughing at "kinesiologists" aside, there's also a general problem in biosciences of re-discovering major ideas every 10-20 years or so. Someone new gets in the field, makes a "seminal" discovery ...that was published 10-20 years ago in a smaller journal. Downside to information overload and the need to filter.
Worked for Jerry Maguire.::